The Girl on the Train by Paula Hawkins

If you’ve already heard of Paula Hawkin’s debut novel The Girl on the Train, you’ve no doubt heard the marketing publicity comparing it to Gone GirlIn a way it’s a fair assertion: 1. a woman goes missing, 2. unreliability of narrator, 3. husband is scrutinized and 4. the publishing timing is not that far off from the success of both the book and film adaptation of the latter. Yet, I think it would be incorrect to lump them together.

girl on the train

 

It’s more like a Hitchcock film. The majority of the plot is relegated to the train itself or a small neighborhood right outside of London. The main narrator is entirely unreliable and she is constantly doubting her own memory–or lack thereof–of what she might have seen, along with others cutting away at her POV.

The Girl on the Train is a book more concerned with telling the story of the women–three to be exact. Where Gone Girl, even when focused on the missing “girl,” was clearly concerned with the husband.

Rachel is a divorcée whose ex-husband still lives in their once shared house, but now with his new wife–who he had carried on an affair while previously married–and their baby girl. Rachel takes the train every day in and out of London, the same commute that takes her past her husband’s house. She also watches another couple, imagining their names, ambitions, and lives. Even though Rachel is so concerned with watching and dissecting, there is one overwhelming point about her: she’s a fall down drunk. Her memory is a wispy thing that flits out of her mind; nothing is nailed down and when she might be the only witness to a possible crime, no one, including herself, initially takes her seriously.

The book is a page-turner, simple as that. When the POV changes to two other women, I wondered why, but it builds, oh, it builds. Hawkins planned this plot. It wouldn’t have been successful otherwise and like any solid Hitchcockian thriller worth its salt, there are multiple red herrings and possible villains (I half-expected Cary Grant to just pop out at any time).

My qualms were few and easily quashed. I was curious how the editor allowed the first few pages. They were mundane. Classic examples that you hear all book people talk about as something to avoid. Unless the readership has been living under a rock, the audience can be trusted to understand what train travel entails. I would’ve had my trusty red pen strike those dull pages describing the train interior, etc. I almost recommend skipping them, but they are so few, so just power through to get to the action.

Rachel is unreliable, infuriating, and compelling. Her choices and actions are so cringe-worthy at times, I couldn’t help but keep one proverbial eye open waiting for her downfalls leading to the reveal. The book would have benefited from some fat trimming, but it seems that most English-language books these days are poured to the brim instead of leaving a little out.

This book is enjoyable all around, but definitely so for those readers who like a solid thriller with unanticipated and unexpected turns.

Has anyone else read this? I had a long-haul flight recently and it was perfect for passing the time!

 

Advertisements

8 comments

    1. It’s more for marketing purposes. Almost all novels are always compared as a cross between at least two other previous books or writers. It’s just part of the formula. I see why they did, but it’s not a completely fair comparison.

  1. Gone Girl is still on my TBR list, but I’m glad to hear you give this one a positive review too. A reading friend at work just read it for her book club and like it too.

    1. Gone Girl was definitely more involved, but this one was a treat, too. I can see more people liking this one, because, although, the main protagonist can be infuriating, her story is more interesting (but I still liked Gone Girl; I was impressed).

  2. Interesting! I haven’t read this book but I’ve seen the cover in book stores and wondered what it was about. A good review – intriguing without revealing too much! The heroine certainly sounds interesting. I’ll watch out for the first few pages. I might add this book to my reading list…

  3. So late to the party – just starting it now and it is a perfect end to the day read. I ration myself to one POV a night and it’s keeping me off my screen and back to how I used to “power down” pre smart phone. Thanks for not including a spoiler!

    1. It’s so funny you write this, because another person just told me yesterday they were reading this book. I hope you enjoy. I don’t know how you’re doing a POV a night. I was totally engrossed! Needed to know the ending. I’m curious to see the movie adaptation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s